I recently took a Shakespearean course in which we read The Merchant of Venice and other Shakespearean plays. When asked to judge of which play was my favorite, I picked The Merchant of Venice because of the moral aspect to the play. However, I was unaware of the depth of the moral aspect until I read Joseph Pearce’s book about the Catholic presence in the major Shakespearean plays. Here I would like to examine my favorite moral element of The Merchant of Venice, Shakespeare’s Marian figure.
Her name is Portia, and she mirrors the Ultimate Feminist herself not only in her actions but her value judgments. Additionally, the other characters denote her Marian status through their actions. What are these actions? What are Portia’s value judgments? I will briefly answer both questions. Bassanio’s actions reflect a reverence towards Portia in that he, according to himself, ought to be on his best behavior around Portia, meaning that at the least “modesty is becoming in her presence” (30). Moreover, Jessica emanates these words when she too raises Portia’s virtue to that of heaven’s (3.5). Here Shakespeare reveals Portia as a Marian figure. Even her home means “mountain of Beauty” (32). And too, the play may be vastly misunderstood if not read from her perspective. Portia is the central character in the play.
Portia’s value judgments are fundamental to the work. Those value judgments have consequences and pertain to problems which also have consequences. I won’t go through all the problems nor their consequences but only wish to focus on Portia’s value judgments. She recognizes the value of prudence and temperance in choosing a husband. She judges they are necessary in doing so (1.2). However, though it would seem her father’s test of a good husband overrides Portia’s choice in the matter, Portia admits that the test prevents her emotional bias which is like a shadow hovering over her potential prudent and tempered actions. The test is crafted to objectively choose a good husband for Portia, but Portia must admirably overcome her emotional bias by subjecting herself to the objective test (36-37). Some post-modern feminists (and others) find this subjugation a foolish act, but a true feminist desiring to imitate Mary finds this subjugation noble. Portia prudently trusts in her father’s test and two significant consequences follow.
One consequence is that Portia recognizes Shylock’s flaw in that he deliberately chooses not to give up that which prevents his focus on heaven, his greed of wealth. The second significant consequence is that Portia recognizes Bassanio’s flaw in that he deliberately chooses to give up that which does not necessarily prevent his focus on heaven, the marriage ring. You may notice the heavy emphasis on choice reminding me of the choice Mary had in subjecting her will to God’s. This is a small example of the Catholic presence in the major Shakespearean plays and is one of the many reasons why I enjoy The Merchant of Venice.
Pearce, Joseph. Through Shakespeare’s Eyes: Seeing the Catholic Presence in the Plays, Ignatius Press, 2010. Print.
Shakespeare, William. The Merchant of Venice, FOLGER Shakespeare Library, 1993. Print.